Comparative Guts

Search
Close this search box.

Comparative
Guts

Maske von Huwawa Die flache weißlich braune Maske aus gebranntem Ton zeigt ein Gesicht mit großen olivenförmigen Augen. Seine übrigen Flächen wie Wangen und Stirn sind mit dünnen spiralförmigen Wülsten, die in verschiedene Richtungen verlaufen, bedeckt. Die Tontafel misst in Länge und Breite etwa 8 Zentimeter. Ihr Umriß entspricht dem eines Kopfes mit seitlich abstehenden Ohren. Unterhalb des Kinns schließt sie mit einer Horizontalen ab. Die Maske ist auf die Vorderseite der Tafel modelliert. Ihre Augenpartie umrahmen Wülste, die unterhalb der Stirn senkrecht nach unten in das Nasenbein übergehen. Oberhalb des Nasenbeins, mittig zwischen den Augen, tritt eine pyramidenförmige Erhebung hervor. Unterhalb der Augen verläuft eine Wulst quer über den Nasenrücken. Die Wangen werden von senkrecht angebrachten Strukturen bedeckt. Wellenförmig verlaufende Schlingen unterhalb der Nase lassen an gefletschte Zähne denken. Das Kinn bilden wiederum horizontal verlaufende Wülste. Die Ohren erscheinen links und rechts als halbkreisförmige Auswölbungen auf Höhe der Augen. Am oberen Rand der Maske bilden kurze senkrecht liegende Wülste eine Art Ponyfrisur ab. An einigen Stellen, besonders oberhalb der Augen erscheint der Ton reflektierend glatt. Die Wülste, Schlingen und Spiralen stehen für Schafseingeweide, insbesondere Gedärme, die zu Zwecken der Vorhersage untersucht wurden. Entsprechend findet sich auf der Rückseite der Tontafel ein in fünf waagrecht verlaufenden Zeilen eingeritzter Omensatz in Keilschrift, der das vorherzusagende in Worte fasste. — — Mask of Huwawa The photo shows a flat whitish-brown mask made of fired clay in front of a black-coloured background. The mask shows a face with large olive-shaped eyes. Its other surfaces, such as the cheeks and forehead, are covered with thin spiralling ridges running in different directions. The clay tablet measures about 8 centimetres in length and width. Its outline corresponds to that of a head and ears protruding from the sides. It ends with a horizontal line below the chin. The mask is sculpted on the front of the tablet. The eye area is framed by bulges which merge vertically downwards into the nasal bone below the forehead. Above the nose bone and centrally between the eyes, a pyramid-shaped elevation emerges. Below the eyes, a bulge runs across the bridge of the nose. The cheeks are covered by vertically placed structures. Undulating loops below the nose suggest bared teeth. The chin is, again, formed by horizontal ridges. The ears appear on the left and right sides of the mask as semicircular bulges at the same level as the eyes. At the upper edge of the mask, short vertical ridges form a kind of fringe. In some places, especially above the eyes, the clay appears reflectively smooth. The bulges, loops and spirals represent sheep entrails, especially intestines, which were examined for predictive purposes. Accordingly, on the back of the clay tablet, there is an omen sentence carved in five horizontal lines in cuneiform writing, putting into words what was to be predicted.

Exploring the Inside of the Body
through Time and Space

This is a comparative exhibition about the human body, and in particular about one body part, the ‘guts’. For these purposes, ‘guts’ refers to everything found inside the lower torso, the organs and parts traditionally linked to nutrition and digestion, but also endowed with emotional, ethical, and metaphysical significance, depending on the representation and narrative.

By offering access to culturally, socially, historically, and sensorially different experiential contexts, Comparative Guts allows the visitor a glimpse into the variety and richness of embodied self-definition, human imagination about our (as well as animal) bodies’ physiology and functioning, our embodied exchange with the external world, and the religious significance of the way we are ‘made’ as living creatures. This dive into difference is simultaneously an enlightening illustration of what is common and shared among living beings.

The ‘guts’ are treated here in as neutral and universal a fashion as possible: not necessarily as functional parts of an organism or as a medical item, but as realities experienced in various ways. The most basic distinction is the sensed, volumetric one: solids for the fleshy organs (such as those referred to in English as the liver and the stomach), coils for the intestines and other parts endowed with complexity, folds, and fluidity, and wholes for the guts understood as part of a coherent whole, be it continuous or assembled.